I guess his premise, that it's for edgy teens. Heck, half the pop references were ancient on launch.

I loved the gameplay of pre sequel. But the writing for that was constantly throwing me for a loop on how any of it was greenlit. I didn't mind the writing in 1 and 2, I got a few chuckles out of that. Pre sequel just made me groan, moan and yawn.

They use the same terms of service for mobile games and they just dont bother to change it for pc games.

but ask those same people whether facebook should be allowed to collect and use all that data, and people will generally say 'no'.

Do we know this is a thing in the EU?

"By scrolling past, you agree to sharing with us (and our affiliates) the following collected data types: ..."

This mistake makes sense to make as a mistake. But also, that's fuckin asinine

Are they actually likely to remove it for this reason? Or is this just wasting the time of people who have to deal with reports at Steam? Like have they actually done something against Steam's TOS?

^edit: wow, a whole flock of Owls in the replies.^

That's just a list of games that used to be good and now suck.

Not a lot. Even when it isn't a flatpak windows software running on linux won't be able to interact with the system anywhere near as deeply as on windows.

They'll be able to tell it's linux, though.

I'm sorry, but Battleborn was brilliant. Deadlock is the first game to re-capture (and expand on) the mix of mechanics Battleborn put together.

Didn't stop Gearbox from shutting it down so that no-one who bought it could ever play again. Not even the story campaign.

It's because Take Two came out with a fuck-you-in-the-ass EULA for all their games. I actually look forward to boycotting someone, there's too much free and discounted shit everywhere

I doubt it though, the game will be 13 years old this year. It wouldn’t make financial sense for them to bother.

New to linux...are flatpaks like sandboxed?

I didn't enjoy the Handsome Collection but free is free. Thanks for sharing.

Sort of. They can be, but are not always.

I see this kind of comment before and I will never understand it - "other companies do it so just bend over and let us do it to you too!"

People say this all the time about Denuvo too: "Other games already have Denuvo, why are you crying about it here when you're playing other games?"

And see, that's the problem - we aren't playing those other Denuvo games. And same thing applies here, guess what, a lot of us aren't buying games from gross companies like EA with these shit terms. So when a company we are doing business with suddenly changes their terms to be shit, that's a valid complaint. Some of us have already been boycotting bad business practices in the industry, so the idea of company changing terms towards the boycott after we've already invested in the game feels like a betrayal because it is.

So maybe stop focusing on what you assume the rest of audience is doing and instead go back to focusing on what the people at the goddamn podium are trying to pull?

It isn't a mistake. Writing different EULA for each game costs more money than writing an overly aggressive one that covers most cases.

absolutely. Steam is not to mess with and takes such matters quite seriously.