Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

NodeBB

  1. Home
  2. Games
  3. The end of Stop Killing Games [Accursed Farms]

The end of Stop Killing Games [Accursed Farms]

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Games
games
32 Posts 17 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ampersandrew@lemmy.worldA This user is from outside of this forum
    ampersandrew@lemmy.worldA This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote last edited by
    #1
    • The EU Citizens petition to stop killing games is not looking good. It's shy of halfway where it needs to be, on a very high threshold, and it's over in a month and change.
    • paraphrasing a little more than a half hour of the video: "Man, fuck Thor/Pirate Software for either lying or misunderstanding and signal boosting his incorrect interpretation of the campaign."
    • The past year has been quite draining on Ross, so he's done campaigning after next month.
    • It will still take a few years for the dust to clear at various consumer protection bureaus in 5 different countries, and the UK's seems to be run by old men who don't understand what's going on.
    • At least The Crew 2 and Motorfest will get offline modes as a consolation prize?
    lime@feddit.nuL sixtyforce@sh.itjust.worksS V qubaxr@lemmy.worldQ D 9 Replies Last reply
    160
    • ampersandrew@lemmy.worldA [email protected]
      • The EU Citizens petition to stop killing games is not looking good. It's shy of halfway where it needs to be, on a very high threshold, and it's over in a month and change.
      • paraphrasing a little more than a half hour of the video: "Man, fuck Thor/Pirate Software for either lying or misunderstanding and signal boosting his incorrect interpretation of the campaign."
      • The past year has been quite draining on Ross, so he's done campaigning after next month.
      • It will still take a few years for the dust to clear at various consumer protection bureaus in 5 different countries, and the UK's seems to be run by old men who don't understand what's going on.
      • At least The Crew 2 and Motorfest will get offline modes as a consolation prize?
      lime@feddit.nuL This user is from outside of this forum
      lime@feddit.nuL This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      yeah my opinion on piratesoftware was really cemented by his inability to do a charitable reading of the petition.

      T 1 Reply Last reply
      61
      • ampersandrew@lemmy.worldA [email protected]
        • The EU Citizens petition to stop killing games is not looking good. It's shy of halfway where it needs to be, on a very high threshold, and it's over in a month and change.
        • paraphrasing a little more than a half hour of the video: "Man, fuck Thor/Pirate Software for either lying or misunderstanding and signal boosting his incorrect interpretation of the campaign."
        • The past year has been quite draining on Ross, so he's done campaigning after next month.
        • It will still take a few years for the dust to clear at various consumer protection bureaus in 5 different countries, and the UK's seems to be run by old men who don't understand what's going on.
        • At least The Crew 2 and Motorfest will get offline modes as a consolation prize?
        sixtyforce@sh.itjust.worksS This user is from outside of this forum
        sixtyforce@sh.itjust.worksS This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        Ah you know, not the outcome I hoped for but it's exactly what I expected from humans.

        paraphrasing a little more than a half hour of the video: “Man, fuck Thor/Pirate Software for either lying or misunderstanding and signal boosting his incorrect interpretation of the campaign.”

        I agreed with Ross previously that Thor taking a really dumb fuck position helped get more attention on the issue that was, IMO, as hopeless as trying to get the masses to care about or understand Net Neutrality. That was what I saw repeated and upvoted at the time even before Thor revealed himself to be a gigantic narcissistic nepo baby bullshitter more recently.

        If you watched the vid OP, what changed his opinion? I'll check it out once I'm home from work regardless.

        tja@sh.itjust.worksT ampersandrew@lemmy.worldA 2 Replies Last reply
        31
        • sixtyforce@sh.itjust.worksS [email protected]

          Ah you know, not the outcome I hoped for but it's exactly what I expected from humans.

          paraphrasing a little more than a half hour of the video: “Man, fuck Thor/Pirate Software for either lying or misunderstanding and signal boosting his incorrect interpretation of the campaign.”

          I agreed with Ross previously that Thor taking a really dumb fuck position helped get more attention on the issue that was, IMO, as hopeless as trying to get the masses to care about or understand Net Neutrality. That was what I saw repeated and upvoted at the time even before Thor revealed himself to be a gigantic narcissistic nepo baby bullshitter more recently.

          If you watched the vid OP, what changed his opinion? I'll check it out once I'm home from work regardless.

          tja@sh.itjust.worksT This user is from outside of this forum
          tja@sh.itjust.worksT This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          I am not following Thor very much, what did he do recently?

          sixtyforce@sh.itjust.worksS 1 Reply Last reply
          7
          • lime@feddit.nuL [email protected]

            yeah my opinion on piratesoftware was really cemented by his inability to do a charitable reading of the petition.

            T This user is from outside of this forum
            T This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            It really was a good ole' internet argument where he was just obnoxiously wrong in his interpretation and remained just as confidently incorrect the entire time.

            1 Reply Last reply
            45
            • ampersandrew@lemmy.worldA [email protected]
              • The EU Citizens petition to stop killing games is not looking good. It's shy of halfway where it needs to be, on a very high threshold, and it's over in a month and change.
              • paraphrasing a little more than a half hour of the video: "Man, fuck Thor/Pirate Software for either lying or misunderstanding and signal boosting his incorrect interpretation of the campaign."
              • The past year has been quite draining on Ross, so he's done campaigning after next month.
              • It will still take a few years for the dust to clear at various consumer protection bureaus in 5 different countries, and the UK's seems to be run by old men who don't understand what's going on.
              • At least The Crew 2 and Motorfest will get offline modes as a consolation prize?
              V This user is from outside of this forum
              V This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              I'm quite lost (disinterested) on MCU stuff as of late, what's going on about Thor? Is there a game?

              lime@feddit.nuL 1 Reply Last reply
              8
              • sixtyforce@sh.itjust.worksS [email protected]

                Ah you know, not the outcome I hoped for but it's exactly what I expected from humans.

                paraphrasing a little more than a half hour of the video: “Man, fuck Thor/Pirate Software for either lying or misunderstanding and signal boosting his incorrect interpretation of the campaign.”

                I agreed with Ross previously that Thor taking a really dumb fuck position helped get more attention on the issue that was, IMO, as hopeless as trying to get the masses to care about or understand Net Neutrality. That was what I saw repeated and upvoted at the time even before Thor revealed himself to be a gigantic narcissistic nepo baby bullshitter more recently.

                If you watched the vid OP, what changed his opinion? I'll check it out once I'm home from work regardless.

                ampersandrew@lemmy.worldA This user is from outside of this forum
                ampersandrew@lemmy.worldA This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                what changed his opinion?

                The metrics on signatures for the citizens' initiative. If it helped, it would have boosted those too, but it didn't. He also got word that at least one very large YouTuber/streamer that he did not name decided to stay quiet about SKG because it would have contradicted Thor.

                I'll also reiterate that 1M signatures out of a population of 450M is an absurdly high threshold to have to reach, so getting 1/10th of that is still impressive, even if it's unsuccessful.

                S 1 Reply Last reply
                20
                • V [email protected]

                  I'm quite lost (disinterested) on MCU stuff as of late, what's going on about Thor? Is there a game?

                  lime@feddit.nuL This user is from outside of this forum
                  lime@feddit.nuL This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  thor is a tech youtuber. it's just his actual name.

                  V 1 Reply Last reply
                  16
                  • tja@sh.itjust.worksT [email protected]

                    I am not following Thor very much, what did he do recently?

                    sixtyforce@sh.itjust.worksS This user is from outside of this forum
                    sixtyforce@sh.itjust.worksS This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    It's all incredibly online, but searching the keywords "piratesoftware WoW drama onlyfangs" will get the ball rolling if you want to see a prime example of how a narcissist acts when getting caught out very publicly. He also embellished his past a lot and that got parroted in every thread mentioning him for months, so that shouldn't be hard to stumble upon.

                    R 1 Reply Last reply
                    14
                    • ampersandrew@lemmy.worldA [email protected]

                      what changed his opinion?

                      The metrics on signatures for the citizens' initiative. If it helped, it would have boosted those too, but it didn't. He also got word that at least one very large YouTuber/streamer that he did not name decided to stay quiet about SKG because it would have contradicted Thor.

                      I'll also reiterate that 1M signatures out of a population of 450M is an absurdly high threshold to have to reach, so getting 1/10th of that is still impressive, even if it's unsuccessful.

                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote last edited by
                      #10

                      Fuck whoever stayed quiet then

                      "Oh no, I might contradict the annoying moron who is wrong! I can't be seen as being on the opposite of that!"

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      18
                      • lime@feddit.nuL [email protected]

                        thor is a tech youtuber. it's just his actual name.

                        V This user is from outside of this forum
                        V This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote last edited by
                        #11

                        Huh. The things I miss out of these days!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        2
                        • ampersandrew@lemmy.worldA [email protected]
                          • The EU Citizens petition to stop killing games is not looking good. It's shy of halfway where it needs to be, on a very high threshold, and it's over in a month and change.
                          • paraphrasing a little more than a half hour of the video: "Man, fuck Thor/Pirate Software for either lying or misunderstanding and signal boosting his incorrect interpretation of the campaign."
                          • The past year has been quite draining on Ross, so he's done campaigning after next month.
                          • It will still take a few years for the dust to clear at various consumer protection bureaus in 5 different countries, and the UK's seems to be run by old men who don't understand what's going on.
                          • At least The Crew 2 and Motorfest will get offline modes as a consolation prize?
                          qubaxr@lemmy.worldQ This user is from outside of this forum
                          qubaxr@lemmy.worldQ This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote last edited by
                          #12

                          It was nice to have some degree of hope for nearly a year. So I guess, thanks for at least giving it a serious attempt Ross.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          41
                          • ampersandrew@lemmy.worldA [email protected]
                            • The EU Citizens petition to stop killing games is not looking good. It's shy of halfway where it needs to be, on a very high threshold, and it's over in a month and change.
                            • paraphrasing a little more than a half hour of the video: "Man, fuck Thor/Pirate Software for either lying or misunderstanding and signal boosting his incorrect interpretation of the campaign."
                            • The past year has been quite draining on Ross, so he's done campaigning after next month.
                            • It will still take a few years for the dust to clear at various consumer protection bureaus in 5 different countries, and the UK's seems to be run by old men who don't understand what's going on.
                            • At least The Crew 2 and Motorfest will get offline modes as a consolation prize?
                            D This user is from outside of this forum
                            D This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote last edited by
                            #13

                            I feel like this needs to be spread as far and wide as possible, and for PirateSoftware to be mass reported for misinformation about an ongoing political initiative.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            16
                            • ampersandrew@lemmy.worldA [email protected]
                              • The EU Citizens petition to stop killing games is not looking good. It's shy of halfway where it needs to be, on a very high threshold, and it's over in a month and change.
                              • paraphrasing a little more than a half hour of the video: "Man, fuck Thor/Pirate Software for either lying or misunderstanding and signal boosting his incorrect interpretation of the campaign."
                              • The past year has been quite draining on Ross, so he's done campaigning after next month.
                              • It will still take a few years for the dust to clear at various consumer protection bureaus in 5 different countries, and the UK's seems to be run by old men who don't understand what's going on.
                              • At least The Crew 2 and Motorfest will get offline modes as a consolation prize?
                              A This user is from outside of this forum
                              A This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote last edited by
                              #14

                              I understand why he's frustrated. EU citizens are just so damn lazy and won't help themselves. I've told all my friends and family, brought it up at parties and other gatherings to anybody who plays games. But there are EU gamers (streamers and consumers alike) who are chronically online, on every proprietary platform out there and who don't give 2 shits about the campaign.

                              Edit: Fuck Thor.

                              J 1 Reply Last reply
                              8
                              • ampersandrew@lemmy.worldA [email protected]
                                • The EU Citizens petition to stop killing games is not looking good. It's shy of halfway where it needs to be, on a very high threshold, and it's over in a month and change.
                                • paraphrasing a little more than a half hour of the video: "Man, fuck Thor/Pirate Software for either lying or misunderstanding and signal boosting his incorrect interpretation of the campaign."
                                • The past year has been quite draining on Ross, so he's done campaigning after next month.
                                • It will still take a few years for the dust to clear at various consumer protection bureaus in 5 different countries, and the UK's seems to be run by old men who don't understand what's going on.
                                • At least The Crew 2 and Motorfest will get offline modes as a consolation prize?
                                C This user is from outside of this forum
                                C This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote last edited by
                                #15

                                I am still of the opinion that they aimed too small and focused too narrow. Games are a "luxury" anyone can live without and it's hard to rally grassroots support behind protecting something that people only use for entertainment. Yeah it's low stakes to force them to let you continue to play it after servers shut down but the same low stakes also makes the petition itself pretty ignorable to anyone who's not a very invested "gamer".

                                Actual right to repair and right to continue to access to the software and services and devices you buy goes SO far beyond mere games, there are other huge impacts to society from exactly the same problem that leads to game servers being shut down, and this petition ignored them completely to focus exclusively on games. I know that was done purposefully, but I think it was a miscalculation.

                                I'm convinced it could have got a lot of support if it had broader aims. Yes if you go after the big boys who are locking down tractor parts and integrated electronic modules so they become obsolete and unrepairable and directly impacting farmers and our food supply, you're going to REALLY piss off some very big business interests who are going to try and kill your petition, but you're also going to help educate and hopefully get a lot of support from politicians who already know this is a problem and from the general public who doesn't care about games but does care about society (at least once they're properly educated about it, which is hard but also a necessary and positive step to even attempt).

                                N lime@feddit.nuL 2 Replies Last reply
                                17
                                • C [email protected]

                                  I am still of the opinion that they aimed too small and focused too narrow. Games are a "luxury" anyone can live without and it's hard to rally grassroots support behind protecting something that people only use for entertainment. Yeah it's low stakes to force them to let you continue to play it after servers shut down but the same low stakes also makes the petition itself pretty ignorable to anyone who's not a very invested "gamer".

                                  Actual right to repair and right to continue to access to the software and services and devices you buy goes SO far beyond mere games, there are other huge impacts to society from exactly the same problem that leads to game servers being shut down, and this petition ignored them completely to focus exclusively on games. I know that was done purposefully, but I think it was a miscalculation.

                                  I'm convinced it could have got a lot of support if it had broader aims. Yes if you go after the big boys who are locking down tractor parts and integrated electronic modules so they become obsolete and unrepairable and directly impacting farmers and our food supply, you're going to REALLY piss off some very big business interests who are going to try and kill your petition, but you're also going to help educate and hopefully get a lot of support from politicians who already know this is a problem and from the general public who doesn't care about games but does care about society (at least once they're properly educated about it, which is hard but also a necessary and positive step to even attempt).

                                  N This user is from outside of this forum
                                  N This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote last edited by [email protected]
                                  #16

                                  It was a shitshow start to finish.

                                  First and foremost: it is an inherently adversarial "movement" name which actively shifts the blame toward developers. One of my gaming buddies was a community manager for one of the studios that got gutted over the past year or so (gotta "love" how that doesn't narrow it down at all) and he definitely had some Thoughts about getting constant social media spam about how they are "killing games" by not releasing offline versions of old games as they were doing layoffs on the regular.

                                  There is a reason the only dev/"dev" who gave any meaningful feedback was thor the shithead. And while it may suck that he didn't have the same opinion as the people accusing devs of killing the games they spent the better part of a decade on... Yeah, pirate software is a dipshit who was just trying to put himself as a position of authority because his dad worked at Blizzard.

                                  But most of the key points he raised were sensationalized but not actually wrong if you look at things from a developer perspective. Well, from the perspective of a developer who expects to get fired any second now because funding will arbitrarily dry up. Yeah, the end result will TOTALLY be that you get an extra six months of salary to make the offline client and not that you'll be held in breach of contract and lose your severance because you couldn't pound that out in a week.

                                  But even without starting things off at "its just about ethics in game journalism" levels of discourse: Yes, yes, yes, I know that Ross et al intentionally were vague and shut the fuck up. If you push "We need legislature on X" to a governing body without an actionable plan? Schoolhouse Rock doesn't start blaring and Aaron Sorkin doesn't... okay, he still gets a boner but for different reasons. What happens is the lobbyists and Jack Thompsons of the world swoop in and make damned sure that those "details get ironed out" the way they want.

                                  It sucks because treating this as part of a larger effort that included actual Game Preservation efforts and worked with policy groups and developers would actually have been awesome AND gotten widespread support even from the studios themselves. Instead it was a flashy campaign that started off by flipping the bird to people getting fired left and right and reveled in its ignorance of how legislature even works. And then managed to get dragged into a slapfight with some jackass who plays wow and sells mobile games.

                                  It was overly narrow in most cases while positioning itself as speaking for some massive swathe of the industry it was actively antagonizing.

                                  ampersandrew@lemmy.worldA lime@feddit.nuL p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.comP 3 Replies Last reply
                                  4
                                  • N [email protected]

                                    It was a shitshow start to finish.

                                    First and foremost: it is an inherently adversarial "movement" name which actively shifts the blame toward developers. One of my gaming buddies was a community manager for one of the studios that got gutted over the past year or so (gotta "love" how that doesn't narrow it down at all) and he definitely had some Thoughts about getting constant social media spam about how they are "killing games" by not releasing offline versions of old games as they were doing layoffs on the regular.

                                    There is a reason the only dev/"dev" who gave any meaningful feedback was thor the shithead. And while it may suck that he didn't have the same opinion as the people accusing devs of killing the games they spent the better part of a decade on... Yeah, pirate software is a dipshit who was just trying to put himself as a position of authority because his dad worked at Blizzard.

                                    But most of the key points he raised were sensationalized but not actually wrong if you look at things from a developer perspective. Well, from the perspective of a developer who expects to get fired any second now because funding will arbitrarily dry up. Yeah, the end result will TOTALLY be that you get an extra six months of salary to make the offline client and not that you'll be held in breach of contract and lose your severance because you couldn't pound that out in a week.

                                    But even without starting things off at "its just about ethics in game journalism" levels of discourse: Yes, yes, yes, I know that Ross et al intentionally were vague and shut the fuck up. If you push "We need legislature on X" to a governing body without an actionable plan? Schoolhouse Rock doesn't start blaring and Aaron Sorkin doesn't... okay, he still gets a boner but for different reasons. What happens is the lobbyists and Jack Thompsons of the world swoop in and make damned sure that those "details get ironed out" the way they want.

                                    It sucks because treating this as part of a larger effort that included actual Game Preservation efforts and worked with policy groups and developers would actually have been awesome AND gotten widespread support even from the studios themselves. Instead it was a flashy campaign that started off by flipping the bird to people getting fired left and right and reveled in its ignorance of how legislature even works. And then managed to get dragged into a slapfight with some jackass who plays wow and sells mobile games.

                                    It was overly narrow in most cases while positioning itself as speaking for some massive swathe of the industry it was actively antagonizing.

                                    ampersandrew@lemmy.worldA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    ampersandrew@lemmy.worldA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    [email protected]
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #17

                                    There was plenty of off-the-record talk from devs who wanted something to show for the years they put into a project that was shut down in less time than it took to make the game in the first place.

                                    N 1 Reply Last reply
                                    5
                                    • ampersandrew@lemmy.worldA [email protected]

                                      There was plenty of off-the-record talk from devs who wanted something to show for the years they put into a project that was shut down in less time than it took to make the game in the first place.

                                      N This user is from outside of this forum
                                      N This user is from outside of this forum
                                      [email protected]
                                      wrote last edited by [email protected]
                                      #18

                                      And that always comes up because it is the truth. It is the same problem as "Well, you worked yourself to death for the past five years but decided you needed to take time off for mental health reasons. Unfortunately, we don't launch until six months from now so go fuck yourself. Hey, send in Fred on your way out so we can tell him he needs to work 90 hour weeks for the next six months but won't have been here long enough to get in the credits".

                                      You know what doesn't get that? Being told you need to architect your game, from the start, to use listen servers while also being unhackable and controlling all progression in the data center AND scaling near infinitely with no host migration issues (oh Warframe...). Or to know that if things even look slightly bad you will have no runway to fix it and will immediately be told to wrap it up and release the "offline mode" in the next month.

                                      ampersandrew@lemmy.worldA 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • C [email protected]

                                        I am still of the opinion that they aimed too small and focused too narrow. Games are a "luxury" anyone can live without and it's hard to rally grassroots support behind protecting something that people only use for entertainment. Yeah it's low stakes to force them to let you continue to play it after servers shut down but the same low stakes also makes the petition itself pretty ignorable to anyone who's not a very invested "gamer".

                                        Actual right to repair and right to continue to access to the software and services and devices you buy goes SO far beyond mere games, there are other huge impacts to society from exactly the same problem that leads to game servers being shut down, and this petition ignored them completely to focus exclusively on games. I know that was done purposefully, but I think it was a miscalculation.

                                        I'm convinced it could have got a lot of support if it had broader aims. Yes if you go after the big boys who are locking down tractor parts and integrated electronic modules so they become obsolete and unrepairable and directly impacting farmers and our food supply, you're going to REALLY piss off some very big business interests who are going to try and kill your petition, but you're also going to help educate and hopefully get a lot of support from politicians who already know this is a problem and from the general public who doesn't care about games but does care about society (at least once they're properly educated about it, which is hard but also a necessary and positive step to even attempt).

                                        lime@feddit.nuL This user is from outside of this forum
                                        lime@feddit.nuL This user is from outside of this forum
                                        [email protected]
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #19

                                        that was sort of the point though. a big case with a narrow focus can later be used as a fulcrum for a wider scope, given that the original case has the right spin. it's also easier than going after the anti-repair people.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        8
                                        • N [email protected]

                                          And that always comes up because it is the truth. It is the same problem as "Well, you worked yourself to death for the past five years but decided you needed to take time off for mental health reasons. Unfortunately, we don't launch until six months from now so go fuck yourself. Hey, send in Fred on your way out so we can tell him he needs to work 90 hour weeks for the next six months but won't have been here long enough to get in the credits".

                                          You know what doesn't get that? Being told you need to architect your game, from the start, to use listen servers while also being unhackable and controlling all progression in the data center AND scaling near infinitely with no host migration issues (oh Warframe...). Or to know that if things even look slightly bad you will have no runway to fix it and will immediately be told to wrap it up and release the "offline mode" in the next month.

                                          ampersandrew@lemmy.worldA This user is from outside of this forum
                                          ampersandrew@lemmy.worldA This user is from outside of this forum
                                          [email protected]
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #20

                                          People can (and shouldn't) be nasty about anything. Part of a community manager's responsibility would be to convey what customers are asking for, and...yeah, games should have listen servers and offline modes and do what they can to prevent cheating. Those are all things that some segment of their customers or potential customers care about. And at the same time, plenty of devs want to make their games live forever but don't have the ability to make it so. It's not inherently adversarial, nor does it inherently shift blame toward developers. We all know why we don't have these things: microtransactions. The people mandating those are the ones with a profit share incentive, which aren't typically the boots on the ground actually building the game.

                                          N 1 Reply Last reply
                                          4
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups