Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

NodeBB

  1. Home
  2. Selfhosted
  3. I got a free HP DL380 G5, so I blogged about it !

I got a free HP DL380 G5, so I blogged about it !

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Selfhosted
selfhosted
19 Posts 10 Posters 8 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ? Guest

    I got this old server and I always like to fiddle with old hardware, so I took a lot of pictures and shared them on my blog with some explaination!

    Feedback always appreciated ^^

    engywuck@lemm.eeE This user is from outside of this forum
    engywuck@lemm.eeE This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote last edited by
    #10

    Just out if curiosity, would this server be capable to handle some consistent workload, for today's standards?

    ? mangopenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM 2 Replies Last reply
    1
    • engywuck@lemm.eeE [email protected]

      Just out if curiosity, would this server be capable to handle some consistent workload, for today's standards?

      ? Offline
      ? Offline
      Guest
      wrote last edited by
      #11

      I mean it would work, but depends on the load, it can definitely host some website, be used as a backup server or something. I installed a modern version of proxmox and even plain debian on it, so it would definitely work. But performance would be poor for heavy task like a game server.

      As for the consistency itself, the server would run 24/7 without an issue, and it's still built like a tank and it has been made to be resilient!

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • ? Guest

        I got this old server and I always like to fiddle with old hardware, so I took a lot of pictures and shared them on my blog with some explaination!

        Feedback always appreciated ^^

        T This user is from outside of this forum
        T This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote last edited by
        #12

        My workplace ran off DL360s (the 1U variant of this) of various generations for 20 or 30 years. I remember getting the first G5 in and being really impressed by the way the components all slotted in so easily and pretty much everything was hot-swappable. And the no-nut rail system was a revalation.

        They were great systems for their time but that power consumption is crazy by today's standards!

        As for feedback, you have a very confusing sentence about 2.5" and 3.5" drives being the same size. Took me far too long to realise you meant capacity and not physical dimensions!

        ? 1 Reply Last reply
        3
        • T [email protected]

          My workplace ran off DL360s (the 1U variant of this) of various generations for 20 or 30 years. I remember getting the first G5 in and being really impressed by the way the components all slotted in so easily and pretty much everything was hot-swappable. And the no-nut rail system was a revalation.

          They were great systems for their time but that power consumption is crazy by today's standards!

          As for feedback, you have a very confusing sentence about 2.5" and 3.5" drives being the same size. Took me far too long to realise you meant capacity and not physical dimensions!

          ? Offline
          ? Offline
          Guest
          wrote last edited by
          #13

          Yeah I have a G6 and a few G8 at home, they are nice machines, even though newer generation feel way cheaper with more plastic...

          And yeah I see how it could be confusing I'll change that ahah!

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • engywuck@lemm.eeE [email protected]

            Just out if curiosity, would this server be capable to handle some consistent workload, for today's standards?

            mangopenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM This user is from outside of this forum
            mangopenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote last edited by [email protected]
            #14

            Yes some, but the power consumption is extremely high. A cheap $40 PC with an i5-6500 CPU would out perform it at about 1/15th the power draw.

            This thing is mostly just interesting to play with.

            engywuck@lemm.eeE 1 Reply Last reply
            5
            • ? Guest

              Yeah, power consumption are never the strong suit of rack mounted servers...

              R This user is from outside of this forum
              R This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote last edited by
              #15

              Power consumption is the 2nd thing i look for in my IT devices (first is "do I need internet/cloud services to run it" ... Yes is an absolut disqualifier)

              1 Reply Last reply
              2
              • mangopenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM [email protected]

                Yes some, but the power consumption is extremely high. A cheap $40 PC with an i5-6500 CPU would out perform it at about 1/15th the power draw.

                This thing is mostly just interesting to play with.

                engywuck@lemm.eeE This user is from outside of this forum
                engywuck@lemm.eeE This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote last edited by
                #16

                Well that's something I didn't expect. Thanks.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • ? Guest

                  Yeah, power consumption are never the strong suit of rack mounted servers...

                  K This user is from outside of this forum
                  K This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote last edited by
                  #17

                  Ive got a R720 running a decent load at the moment pulling 90W, which is about what my laptop uses. So you can totally do rack mount machines that aren't howling winter heaters.

                  ? 1 Reply Last reply
                  3
                  • K [email protected]

                    Ive got a R720 running a decent load at the moment pulling 90W, which is about what my laptop uses. So you can totally do rack mount machines that aren't howling winter heaters.

                    ? Offline
                    ? Offline
                    Guest
                    wrote last edited by
                    #18

                    Yeah true, but compared to what performance you can have with "normal" hardware, the difference is huge!
                    I'm never saying it can't be done, but the difference exists!

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L [email protected]

                      Powered off it uses almost twice the energy of my server.

                      That's insane.

                      N This user is from outside of this forum
                      N This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote last edited by
                      #19

                      Oh, wow, you weren't joking. Jeez.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups