Hi, why are you migrating away from Joplin?
Did you know you can use it in non-markdown mode (basically wysiwyg) I found myself to use it more and more. And the md is still underlayed and I can switch to it if I have issues with the editor. You can link between notes too. There is a plugin to see a notes map (kinda like obsidian.

I like Jopin, but the user experience feels a bit old (don't want to say outdated) compared to something like Logseq.

And I also like the idea of links between notes and it becoming a graph. My nested folder structure in Joplin has gotten large.

I don't like that Joplin does not store the notes as real markdown. They are not readable by humans until you export them.

I do not want Wysiwyg via mouse, e.g. by clicking the "bold" button. Trying out Logseq felt really good. For example, it allows to open sections of a large file on the right, which is nice, because you can easily focus on that part.

I like how Logseq has a nice "table of content" plugin that renders the TOC on the side instead of injecting it into the markdown file, which is not nice, because the file changes and you need to always update the TOC.

But I also don't like what others describe here about Logseq's markdown handling. A heading being after a bullet point feels wrong.

Adding functionality to Joplin via Plugins is an option, but the plugins will maybe not work on Android...

IMO, there is no optimal solution for me. I like parts of Joplin and others of Logseq, but there is no solution that has all of them.

I migrated from Joplin to Obsidian a year or two ago. It was straightforward. With Joplin, I had to use the export functionality from the desktop app. That cleaned up any non-standard bits and allowed for a straightforward import into Obsidian.

I use Markor Notes on my android device with syncthing to send it all to my PC. It's a terrific markdown (and general text) editor that doesn't have much of an opinion about how you organize your files.

Hey,

I'm using Joplin (a Markdown note taking app) and think about migrating to Logseq because of multiple reasons.

The main problems I have not yet solved:

1. OSS-Syncing Logseq notes between Desktop OS and Android. Logseq does not have an OSS selfhostable sync-server like Joplin has...
2. Making sure to transform my stuff, so that Logseq can work with it. Yes, it's both Markdown, but especially images and how Joplin handles them seem to be a problem for this migration.

What are your experiences? Have you ever switched between 2 Markdown note taking apps?

• Which ones?
• How well went it?

Is it maybe even possible to use app 1 and a Desktop OS and a totally different app on Android simultaneously on the same data? The common standard is Markdown...

I use it for a few years now and it's lightweight and useful. Also my markdown notes are in real folders without much database overhead.
A few things I miss (and would like to see added in form of plugins to keep the pure style):

• A real folder navigator additionally to the open pages dialogue
• A proper WYSIWYG export to PDF
• Drawn, diagram and mindmap style notes

But it's still my favourite over Obsidian.

Got it. I don't know Logseq, I will check it out, thanks for the tip.
A few notes regarding Joplin (some of which I already stated above)

• you can link between notes and add plugin to see the graph. To get a note link, click on it with right button and there is an option to copy a link to that note. You can also link to a section of note with hashtags
• joplin actually store the notes in md. However, if you have encryption turned on, you will of course see gibberish upon openning the file (its possible its only when you sync with filesystem I am not sure).
• the wysiwyg (and md as well) works also with shortcuts e.g. ctrl+b
• Joplin also has table of content plugin, its called "Outline" and its sitting in the right bar. You can add plugins in Tools > Options > Plugins
• I didn't check the plugins on android, I don't use it much there mostly for quick checks
• its hard to find something that fits you 100 %, but you can try make your own, that is how most of the foss projects start

Thanks.

"Outline" looks interesting... Bad project name (hard to find), but good job.

you can link between notes and add plugin to see the graph. To get a note link, click on it with right button and there is an option to copy a link to that note. You can also link to a section of note with hashtags

Thanks. But I'm immediately asking myself, why Joplin had to reinvent the wheel here. Some other apps to the same. I get that Markdown itself was "underspecified".

But why does a link to a different note need to look like this?

[Test](:/981236487219346972134687216439723)

A colon followed by a / and the name of the file without its extension (md).... This kind of makes sure that other markdown apps won't be able to handle it. I know that others use [[Name]] notation or @@Name notation, but why not just sticking to the basics and using something like...

[Test](981236487219346972134687216439723.md)

...?

its hard to find something that fits you 100 %, but you can try make your own, that is how most of the foss projects start

True

Hey,

I'm using Joplin (a Markdown note taking app) and think about migrating to Logseq because of multiple reasons.

The main problems I have not yet solved:

1. OSS-Syncing Logseq notes between Desktop OS and Android. Logseq does not have an OSS selfhostable sync-server like Joplin has...
2. Making sure to transform my stuff, so that Logseq can work with it. Yes, it's both Markdown, but especially images and how Joplin handles them seem to be a problem for this migration.

What are your experiences? Have you ever switched between 2 Markdown note taking apps?

• Which ones?
• How well went it?

Is it maybe even possible to use app 1 and a Desktop OS and a totally different app on Android simultaneously on the same data? The common standard is Markdown...

Do you mean a tree view, if yes then this might fit the bill
https://github.com/joekrill/silverbullet-treeview