Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

NodeBB

  1. Home
  2. Selfhosted
  3. ISPs seem designed to funnel people to capitalist cloud services

ISPs seem designed to funnel people to capitalist cloud services

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Selfhosted
selfhosted
18 Posts 6 Posters 2 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • E This user is from outside of this forum
    E This user is from outside of this forum
    ellie@slrpnk.net
    wrote on 29 May 2025, 20:47 last edited by
    #1

    (Sorry if this is too off-topic:) ISPs seem designed to funnel people to capitalist cloud services, or at least I feel like that. And it endlessly frustrates me.

    The reason is even though IPv6 addresses are widely available (unlike IPv4), most ISPs won't allow consumers to request a static rather than a dynamic IPv6 prefix along with a couple of IPv6 reverse DNS entries.

    Instead, this functionality is gatekept behind expensive premium or even business contracts, in many cases even requiring legal paperwork proving you have a registered business, so that the common user is completely unable to self-host e.g. a fully functional IPv6-only mail server with reverse DNS, even if they wanted to.

    The common workaround is to suck up to the cloud, and rent a VPS, or some other foreign controlled machine that can be easily intercepted and messed with, and where the service can be surveilled better by big money.

    I'm posting this since I hope more people will realize that this is going on, and both complain to their ISPs, but most notably to regulatory bodies and to generally spread the word. If we want true digital autonomy to be more common, I feel like this needs to be fixed for consumer landline contracts.

    Or did I miss something that makes this make sense outside of a big money capitalist angle?

    S D F 3 Replies Last reply 29 May 2025, 20:57
    7
    • E ellie@slrpnk.net
      29 May 2025, 20:47

      (Sorry if this is too off-topic:) ISPs seem designed to funnel people to capitalist cloud services, or at least I feel like that. And it endlessly frustrates me.

      The reason is even though IPv6 addresses are widely available (unlike IPv4), most ISPs won't allow consumers to request a static rather than a dynamic IPv6 prefix along with a couple of IPv6 reverse DNS entries.

      Instead, this functionality is gatekept behind expensive premium or even business contracts, in many cases even requiring legal paperwork proving you have a registered business, so that the common user is completely unable to self-host e.g. a fully functional IPv6-only mail server with reverse DNS, even if they wanted to.

      The common workaround is to suck up to the cloud, and rent a VPS, or some other foreign controlled machine that can be easily intercepted and messed with, and where the service can be surveilled better by big money.

      I'm posting this since I hope more people will realize that this is going on, and both complain to their ISPs, but most notably to regulatory bodies and to generally spread the word. If we want true digital autonomy to be more common, I feel like this needs to be fixed for consumer landline contracts.

      Or did I miss something that makes this make sense outside of a big money capitalist angle?

      S This user is from outside of this forum
      S This user is from outside of this forum
      solrize@lemmy.ml
      wrote on 29 May 2025, 20:57 last edited by
      #2

      I think there are still enough v4-only systems out there that you don't really want to host a mail server on v6. You are right though that it would be nice to be able to get static v6 (or for that matter v4) addresses from home isp's. Some do offer that of course.

      Another issue can be that the average home internet user has no idea keep even a client system secure. So ISP's might use NAT and default firewall configurations partly to stop incoming connections on the theory that they are likely to be malicious. On home routers you can usually open ports if you know what you're doing. I don't know if that's even possible on mobile phones.

      ? 1 Reply Last reply 29 May 2025, 21:59
      0
      • E ellie@slrpnk.net
        29 May 2025, 20:47

        (Sorry if this is too off-topic:) ISPs seem designed to funnel people to capitalist cloud services, or at least I feel like that. And it endlessly frustrates me.

        The reason is even though IPv6 addresses are widely available (unlike IPv4), most ISPs won't allow consumers to request a static rather than a dynamic IPv6 prefix along with a couple of IPv6 reverse DNS entries.

        Instead, this functionality is gatekept behind expensive premium or even business contracts, in many cases even requiring legal paperwork proving you have a registered business, so that the common user is completely unable to self-host e.g. a fully functional IPv6-only mail server with reverse DNS, even if they wanted to.

        The common workaround is to suck up to the cloud, and rent a VPS, or some other foreign controlled machine that can be easily intercepted and messed with, and where the service can be surveilled better by big money.

        I'm posting this since I hope more people will realize that this is going on, and both complain to their ISPs, but most notably to regulatory bodies and to generally spread the word. If we want true digital autonomy to be more common, I feel like this needs to be fixed for consumer landline contracts.

        Or did I miss something that makes this make sense outside of a big money capitalist angle?

        D This user is from outside of this forum
        D This user is from outside of this forum
        dgdft@lemmy.world
        wrote on 29 May 2025, 21:04 last edited by
        #3

        If you’re looking for sympathy, you got it. Fuck the state.

        If you’re looking for solutions, use a cheap $5/mo VPS that exists purely as your gateway host. Run everything you want on your home machines, then tunnel the traffic to your gateway and reverse-proxy it there. Your data stays in your hands, you can spin up and expose new services publicly in a matter of minutes, AND your home IP isn’t vulnerable to doxxing or DoS.

        A 1 Reply Last reply 31 May 2025, 01:19
        1
        • S solrize@lemmy.ml
          29 May 2025, 20:57

          I think there are still enough v4-only systems out there that you don't really want to host a mail server on v6. You are right though that it would be nice to be able to get static v6 (or for that matter v4) addresses from home isp's. Some do offer that of course.

          Another issue can be that the average home internet user has no idea keep even a client system secure. So ISP's might use NAT and default firewall configurations partly to stop incoming connections on the theory that they are likely to be malicious. On home routers you can usually open ports if you know what you're doing. I don't know if that's even possible on mobile phones.

          ? Offline
          ? Offline
          Guest
          wrote on 29 May 2025, 21:59 last edited by
          #4

          IP blocklisting is still very much a thing as well so you can expect any mail originating from a residential IP to be rejected due to their /24 or larger having previously sent spam, and that assumes you can send server-to-server mail (destination port 25/tcp) in the first place since many ISPs and server providers block traffic destined to that port by default to prevent users from getting their IP blocklists. My home ISP blocks outbound SNMP traffic (or at least did 10 years ago) presumably to also prevent abuse. That said, things like blocking inbound port 80/tcp and 443/tcp is purely a measure to prevent people running servers at home which I’m not a fan of.

          S 1 Reply Last reply 30 May 2025, 01:11
          0
          • ? Guest
            29 May 2025, 21:59

            IP blocklisting is still very much a thing as well so you can expect any mail originating from a residential IP to be rejected due to their /24 or larger having previously sent spam, and that assumes you can send server-to-server mail (destination port 25/tcp) in the first place since many ISPs and server providers block traffic destined to that port by default to prevent users from getting their IP blocklists. My home ISP blocks outbound SNMP traffic (or at least did 10 years ago) presumably to also prevent abuse. That said, things like blocking inbound port 80/tcp and 443/tcp is purely a measure to prevent people running servers at home which I’m not a fan of.

            S This user is from outside of this forum
            S This user is from outside of this forum
            solrize@lemmy.ml
            wrote on 30 May 2025, 01:11 last edited by
            #5

            Yes, that too. I hadn't even thought about trying to send email from a home ISP. Everyone knows you basically can't. I thought the idea was to receive email rather than send it, so you wouldn't be relying on some bigtech company to store it for you.

            E 1 Reply Last reply 27 days ago
            0
            • D dgdft@lemmy.world
              29 May 2025, 21:04

              If you’re looking for sympathy, you got it. Fuck the state.

              If you’re looking for solutions, use a cheap $5/mo VPS that exists purely as your gateway host. Run everything you want on your home machines, then tunnel the traffic to your gateway and reverse-proxy it there. Your data stays in your hands, you can spin up and expose new services publicly in a matter of minutes, AND your home IP isn’t vulnerable to doxxing or DoS.

              A This user is from outside of this forum
              A This user is from outside of this forum
              a@91268476.xyz
              wrote on 31 May 2025, 01:19 last edited by
              #6

              @dgdft @ellie @selfhosted this is the way

              E 1 Reply Last reply 27 days ago
              0
              • E ellie@slrpnk.net
                29 May 2025, 20:47

                (Sorry if this is too off-topic:) ISPs seem designed to funnel people to capitalist cloud services, or at least I feel like that. And it endlessly frustrates me.

                The reason is even though IPv6 addresses are widely available (unlike IPv4), most ISPs won't allow consumers to request a static rather than a dynamic IPv6 prefix along with a couple of IPv6 reverse DNS entries.

                Instead, this functionality is gatekept behind expensive premium or even business contracts, in many cases even requiring legal paperwork proving you have a registered business, so that the common user is completely unable to self-host e.g. a fully functional IPv6-only mail server with reverse DNS, even if they wanted to.

                The common workaround is to suck up to the cloud, and rent a VPS, or some other foreign controlled machine that can be easily intercepted and messed with, and where the service can be surveilled better by big money.

                I'm posting this since I hope more people will realize that this is going on, and both complain to their ISPs, but most notably to regulatory bodies and to generally spread the word. If we want true digital autonomy to be more common, I feel like this needs to be fixed for consumer landline contracts.

                Or did I miss something that makes this make sense outside of a big money capitalist angle?

                F This user is from outside of this forum
                F This user is from outside of this forum
                fuzzypyro@lemmy.world
                wrote on 1 Jun 2025, 12:18 last edited by
                #7

                If you have control over at least the root of your network you can totally get away with hosting in a dynamic pub ip. You just need to set up dynamicdns. There are other ways of handling this specific issue too. You can always go to a colocation and set up a server there if you want. You could also create your own reverse proxy tunnel in a place that is public then forward it. There are lots of work arounds really. Yeah, it sucks that American ISPs generally don’t support ipv6 but there are totally ways to work around it all.

                What really gets me up in arms is when they advertise gigabit connections or 500mb speeds only to limit upload to 20mb/s. That is where they are actively inhibiting self hosting communities.

                E 1 Reply Last reply 2 Jun 2025, 11:53
                1
                • F fuzzypyro@lemmy.world
                  1 Jun 2025, 12:18

                  If you have control over at least the root of your network you can totally get away with hosting in a dynamic pub ip. You just need to set up dynamicdns. There are other ways of handling this specific issue too. You can always go to a colocation and set up a server there if you want. You could also create your own reverse proxy tunnel in a place that is public then forward it. There are lots of work arounds really. Yeah, it sucks that American ISPs generally don’t support ipv6 but there are totally ways to work around it all.

                  What really gets me up in arms is when they advertise gigabit connections or 500mb speeds only to limit upload to 20mb/s. That is where they are actively inhibiting self hosting communities.

                  E This user is from outside of this forum
                  E This user is from outside of this forum
                  ellie@slrpnk.net
                  wrote on 2 Jun 2025, 11:53 last edited by
                  #8

                  Even in an ideal DNS setup, you're probably going to have downtimes whenever your dynamic IP changes. If only because some ISPs even force-disconnect you after a while to change your address.

                  F 1 Reply Last reply 2 Jun 2025, 16:54
                  0
                  • E ellie@slrpnk.net
                    2 Jun 2025, 11:53

                    Even in an ideal DNS setup, you're probably going to have downtimes whenever your dynamic IP changes. If only because some ISPs even force-disconnect you after a while to change your address.

                    F This user is from outside of this forum
                    F This user is from outside of this forum
                    fuzzypyro@lemmy.world
                    wrote on 2 Jun 2025, 16:54 last edited by
                    #9

                    I mean I’ll be real. Sure in some circumstances that could be an annoyance for 15 seconds for some software that might rely on a session whenever your ip changes like once a month if that. A rotating ip is probably one of the easiest things to work around amongst the plethora of challenges that ISPs present for those who want to self host.

                    I mean just take a look at what is involved if you are in a situation where cg-nat is implemented. You legitimately have no control over the root of your network at that point. I have that issue in particular with what is essentially a mobile hotspot as my failover for when my fiber fails. That being said I had to architect it in a way that took that took cg-nat into consideration. If I hadn’t then when fiber fails it would take down my services as a whole anyway.

                    My point is that those challenges have workarounds, you can solve those issues relatively easily and they even present a level of security. Where it is actively malicious is with restrictions to capacity such as upload limits in which they to a degree lie about their speeds and capacity. The terms of service stuff is just flat out awful too.

                    E 1 Reply Last reply 2 Jun 2025, 21:04
                    1
                    • F fuzzypyro@lemmy.world
                      2 Jun 2025, 16:54

                      I mean I’ll be real. Sure in some circumstances that could be an annoyance for 15 seconds for some software that might rely on a session whenever your ip changes like once a month if that. A rotating ip is probably one of the easiest things to work around amongst the plethora of challenges that ISPs present for those who want to self host.

                      I mean just take a look at what is involved if you are in a situation where cg-nat is implemented. You legitimately have no control over the root of your network at that point. I have that issue in particular with what is essentially a mobile hotspot as my failover for when my fiber fails. That being said I had to architect it in a way that took that took cg-nat into consideration. If I hadn’t then when fiber fails it would take down my services as a whole anyway.

                      My point is that those challenges have workarounds, you can solve those issues relatively easily and they even present a level of security. Where it is actively malicious is with restrictions to capacity such as upload limits in which they to a degree lie about their speeds and capacity. The terms of service stuff is just flat out awful too.

                      E This user is from outside of this forum
                      E This user is from outside of this forum
                      ellie@slrpnk.net
                      wrote on 2 Jun 2025, 21:04 last edited by ellie@slrpnk.net 6 Feb 2025, 20:17
                      #10

                      Some ISPs require changes ever 24 hours and will disconnect you if needed. Also, if you set DNS to cache such a short amount of time that you can react to that in 5 minutes, you will incur way more DNS traffic which can become a problem when your site is busier. Also, even if your DNS TTL is set to a super short value, a web search suggests to me in practice there will likely be downstream clients and networks that ignore it and won't really update in such a short time frame.

                      F 1 Reply Last reply 3 Jun 2025, 13:53
                      0
                      • E ellie@slrpnk.net
                        2 Jun 2025, 21:04

                        Some ISPs require changes ever 24 hours and will disconnect you if needed. Also, if you set DNS to cache such a short amount of time that you can react to that in 5 minutes, you will incur way more DNS traffic which can become a problem when your site is busier. Also, even if your DNS TTL is set to a super short value, a web search suggests to me in practice there will likely be downstream clients and networks that ignore it and won't really update in such a short time frame.

                        F This user is from outside of this forum
                        F This user is from outside of this forum
                        fuzzypyro@lemmy.world
                        wrote on 3 Jun 2025, 13:53 last edited by
                        #11

                        What ISP are you referring to? I have genuinely never heard of an isp that takes 24 hours to rotate your IP. Also utilizing dynamicdns is not going to incur more dns traffic? Dynamic DNS updates your dns provider from a system on your local network that your pub ip has changed then your provider will start sending traffic to the new ip. Propagation used to take a while but I haven’t experienced propagation wait times of over 10 minutes in years. This all being said dynamic DNS isn’t exactly the most elegant solution. It is just one of the simplest that I mentioned. There are significantly better options overall that completely take the requirement of a static pubip completely out of the equation and can be built using all free open source tools relatively easily.

                        E 1 Reply Last reply 3 Jun 2025, 14:07
                        0
                        • F fuzzypyro@lemmy.world
                          3 Jun 2025, 13:53

                          What ISP are you referring to? I have genuinely never heard of an isp that takes 24 hours to rotate your IP. Also utilizing dynamicdns is not going to incur more dns traffic? Dynamic DNS updates your dns provider from a system on your local network that your pub ip has changed then your provider will start sending traffic to the new ip. Propagation used to take a while but I haven’t experienced propagation wait times of over 10 minutes in years. This all being said dynamic DNS isn’t exactly the most elegant solution. It is just one of the simplest that I mentioned. There are significantly better options overall that completely take the requirement of a static pubip completely out of the equation and can be built using all free open source tools relatively easily.

                          E This user is from outside of this forum
                          E This user is from outside of this forum
                          ellie@slrpnk.net
                          wrote on 3 Jun 2025, 14:07 last edited by
                          #12

                          It causes way more traffic for the DNS server to use a shorter TTL, so yes, it does incur more DNS traffic. In Germany some providers will disconnect you regularly if you stay connected for too long.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • A a@91268476.xyz
                            31 May 2025, 01:19

                            @dgdft @ellie @selfhosted this is the way

                            E This user is from outside of this forum
                            E This user is from outside of this forum
                            ellie@slrpnk.net
                            wrote 27 days ago last edited by
                            #13

                            While I agree on a practical level, and pragmatism sure is important, long term that workaround still keeps you paying for cloud services and gives cloud companies an easy way to directly man-in-the-middle your traffic. So I'm hoping one day the situation will improve.

                            A 1 Reply Last reply 27 days ago
                            0
                            • E ellie@slrpnk.net
                              27 days ago

                              While I agree on a practical level, and pragmatism sure is important, long term that workaround still keeps you paying for cloud services and gives cloud companies an easy way to directly man-in-the-middle your traffic. So I'm hoping one day the situation will improve.

                              A This user is from outside of this forum
                              A This user is from outside of this forum
                              a@91268476.xyz
                              wrote 27 days ago last edited by
                              #14

                              @ellie @selfhosted what is the actual alternative? also, not all vps are offfered by megacorps.

                              E 1 Reply Last reply 27 days ago
                              0
                              • A a@91268476.xyz
                                27 days ago

                                @ellie @selfhosted what is the actual alternative? also, not all vps are offfered by megacorps.

                                E This user is from outside of this forum
                                E This user is from outside of this forum
                                ellie@slrpnk.net
                                wrote 27 days ago last edited by ellie@slrpnk.net
                                #15

                                The alternative is to get your ISP to offer you a static IPv6 and a reverse DNS PTR entry for your IPv6, like I asked for in the initial post. Some ISPs do if you offer them more money, some only do if you offer them more money and a legit business registration, apparently a few rare ones do it for free, and some never do it.

                                Once you got the static IP, you can point DNS directly to yourself, and there's no VPS or anything in between. Browser traffic and so on directly comes to your machine.

                                A 1 Reply Last reply 27 days ago
                                0
                                • E ellie@slrpnk.net
                                  27 days ago

                                  The alternative is to get your ISP to offer you a static IPv6 and a reverse DNS PTR entry for your IPv6, like I asked for in the initial post. Some ISPs do if you offer them more money, some only do if you offer them more money and a legit business registration, apparently a few rare ones do it for free, and some never do it.

                                  Once you got the static IP, you can point DNS directly to yourself, and there's no VPS or anything in between. Browser traffic and so on directly comes to your machine.

                                  A This user is from outside of this forum
                                  A This user is from outside of this forum
                                  a@91268476.xyz
                                  wrote 27 days ago last edited by
                                  #16

                                  @ellie @selfhosted I've never seen that from an ISP. 🤷‍♂️

                                  E 1 Reply Last reply 26 days ago
                                  0
                                  • S solrize@lemmy.ml
                                    30 May 2025, 01:11

                                    Yes, that too. I hadn't even thought about trying to send email from a home ISP. Everyone knows you basically can't. I thought the idea was to receive email rather than send it, so you wouldn't be relying on some bigtech company to store it for you.

                                    E This user is from outside of this forum
                                    E This user is from outside of this forum
                                    ellie@slrpnk.net
                                    wrote 27 days ago last edited by ellie@slrpnk.net
                                    #17

                                    For what it's worth, regarding port blocks, I had relatively good experiences with that with a local ISP here. There's no guarantee, but many ISPs block SMTP to prevent accidental zombie botnets from sending email and not technical users, so by asking might already be enough to show that you know enough about it to be unblocked.

                                    As for the blocks, many spamlists you can get yourself unlisted. But I don't know what permanent range blocks may exist in some systems beyond that.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • A a@91268476.xyz
                                      27 days ago

                                      @ellie @selfhosted I've never seen that from an ISP. 🤷‍♂️

                                      E This user is from outside of this forum
                                      E This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ellie@slrpnk.net
                                      wrote 26 days ago last edited by
                                      #18

                                      Most offer it, but often not for the regular consumer contracts.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Login

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular
                                      • World
                                      • Users
                                      • Groups