@kibiz0r @CapriciousDay
-
> it’s not a sustainable 100%-of-the-time every-single-day pace
The agile manifesto seems to disagree with you:
> Agile processes promote sustainable development. The sponsors, developers, and users should be able to maintain a constant pace indefinitely.
And it has some answers for the development of tools and refactoring as well.
-
> it’s not a sustainable 100%-of-the-time every-single-day pace
The agile manifesto seems to disagree with you:
> Agile processes promote sustainable development. The sponsors, developers, and users should be able to maintain a constant pace indefinitely.
And it has some answers for the development of tools and refactoring as well.
wrote last edited by [email protected]The process is supposed to be sustainable. That doesn’t mean you can take one activity and do it to the exclusion of all others and have that be sustainable.
Edit:
Also, regretably, I’m using the now-common framing where “agile” === Scrum.
If we wanna get pure about it, the manifesto doesn’t say anything about sprints. (And also, you don’t do agile… you do a process which is agile. It’s a set of criteria to measure a process against, not a process itself.)
And reasonable people can definitely assert that Scrum does not meet all the criteria in the agile manifesto — at least, as Scrum is usually practiced.