Cyberpunk 2 is now in preproduction, CD Projekt says
-
I really enjoyed it and didn't experience any bugs as I waited for it to be sorted. It was also one of the rare games that held my attention long enough to finish, so that's probably why I think highly of it. Love that I'm being downvoted! I'll know not to bother contributing my opinion next time.
wrote on 30 May 2025, 11:42 last edited by umbrella@lemmy.ml 6 May 2025, 01:00.
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote on 30 May 2025, 11:43 last edited by
Just looking up what 'preproduction' actually means : They are in the planning stages, but they haven't started 'making' the game yet. Cyberpunk (1) development took four years.
-
I don't care.
Shut up about the game.
Don't fucking say a thing about it until its like 6 months from launch.
Did they learn nothing from last time?!
wrote on 30 May 2025, 11:45 last edited byYou can start any time, for example ignore the news?
-
Phantom Liberty was the best damn DLC ---- I've ---- ever played
Yes, dumbass, which is why I said it's the best for me, subjectively. Don't fucking reply if you're too stupid to read what I write.
wrote on 30 May 2025, 12:43 last edited byI love how you've personally taken offense to everyone shitting on your precious cyberpunk in this thread. It was broken trash in 2020 and it's only slightly less trash in 2025 bud. Sorry you have poor taste.
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote on 30 May 2025, 12:53 last edited by
Let's hope they learned how to properly pace development and to handle a launch this time around.
-
I love how you've personally taken offense to everyone shitting on your precious cyberpunk in this thread. It was broken trash in 2020 and it's only slightly less trash in 2025 bud. Sorry you have poor taste.
wrote on 30 May 2025, 14:11 last edited byWhat I take offense to is incel neckbeards coming into a thread and shitting on everyone who likes something they don’t.
-
What I take offense to is incel neckbeards coming into a thread and shitting on everyone who likes something they don’t.
wrote on 30 May 2025, 15:03 last edited byincel neckbeards
What a blisteringly stupid thing to say, considering I'm a woman.
-
incel neckbeards
What a blisteringly stupid thing to say, considering I'm a woman.
wrote on 30 May 2025, 15:08 last edited byOh, sorry for misgendering you then. I meant to say femcel neckbeard.
-
I'll defend it if I want. Neither you nor anyone else gets to decide anything for me, so fuck out of here with that attitude. There's a reason you and the people who share your opinion are getting downvoted so much in this thread. That reason is people think your opinion is shit.
wrote on 30 May 2025, 17:33 last edited by secret300@lemmy.sdf.orgThat's a wild to me that you'd defend blatant greed, but to each their own I guess.
-
That's a wild to me that you'd defend blatant greed, but to each their own I guess.
wrote on 30 May 2025, 17:41 last edited byNobody here has done that, and that's such a piss-poor attempt at a straw man that you frankly should be ashamed of even trying it.
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote on 30 May 2025, 17:55 last edited by brucethemoose@lemmy.world
Spicy take: I hope they dump 2077's engine and go Unreal.
I recently followed this guide to try and set up "optimized" path tracing (no raster lighting, with everything raytraced) in 2077, and on my lowly RTX 3090 it runs like cold molasses. Not a chance. Raster + RT reflections is all I can manage, and it looks... good.
Meanwhile, I've also been playing Satisfactory (an Unreal Engine game from a comparatively microscopic studio), and holy moly. Unreal Engine's dynamic lighting looks scary good. Like, I get light bounces and reflections and everything, and it runs at like quadruple the FPS in hilariously complex areas, again, with a fraction of the dev effort.
Cryengine in KCD2 is rather sick as well, though probably less tuned for urban landscapes.
...So why don't they save a few years and many millions, and just go with one of those instead of poorly reinventing the wheel?
-
Spicy take: I hope they dump 2077's engine and go Unreal.
I recently followed this guide to try and set up "optimized" path tracing (no raster lighting, with everything raytraced) in 2077, and on my lowly RTX 3090 it runs like cold molasses. Not a chance. Raster + RT reflections is all I can manage, and it looks... good.
Meanwhile, I've also been playing Satisfactory (an Unreal Engine game from a comparatively microscopic studio), and holy moly. Unreal Engine's dynamic lighting looks scary good. Like, I get light bounces and reflections and everything, and it runs at like quadruple the FPS in hilariously complex areas, again, with a fraction of the dev effort.
Cryengine in KCD2 is rather sick as well, though probably less tuned for urban landscapes.
...So why don't they save a few years and many millions, and just go with one of those instead of poorly reinventing the wheel?
wrote on 30 May 2025, 18:23 last edited byI have good news for you. The first information released on the sequel was that it's being built in unreal.
-
I have good news for you. The first information released on the sequel was that it's being built in unreal.
wrote on 30 May 2025, 18:25 last edited byThat's what I get for not clicking through!
Good! I can see a ton of gamers complaining about this endlessly, but switching to anything but in-house is a great move IMO.
-
::: spoiler spoiler
askldjfals;jflsad;
:::wrote on 30 May 2025, 18:32 last edited byIn your article it talks about how performance was bad on old consoles systems. This is where the refunds were mostly provided. ON PC, many users did not have this issue.
As you stated everyones PC is different. There's no gaslighting. You are just conflating statements.
From your article:
“Despite good reviews on PC, the console version of Cyberpunk 2077 did not meet the quality standard we wanted it to meet,”
Your statement directly conflict with the article you shared.
-
Nobody here has done that, and that's such a piss-poor attempt at a straw man that you frankly should be ashamed of even trying it.
wrote on 30 May 2025, 19:15 last edited byYou literally are....? I'm shitting on CDPR for their greed and you're saying it's your choice to support them.
-
You literally are....? I'm shitting on CDPR for their greed and you're saying it's your choice to support them.
wrote on 30 May 2025, 19:26 last edited byJust a note, saying “literally” does not, in fact, make something true. Nor am I responsible for your inability to comprehend what you read.
-
Just a note, saying “literally” does not, in fact, make something true. Nor am I responsible for your inability to comprehend what you read.
wrote on 30 May 2025, 19:28 last edited byThis is you LITERALLY saying I'll defend it...
-
This is you LITERALLY saying I'll defend it...
wrote on 30 May 2025, 19:35 last edited byThat is me literally saying I’ll defend the game. It’s your words that defending the game is defending “greed”, which is a bullshit, weak ass argument.
-
And it was greedy as hell because when that DLC was announced and released the game was still buggy and unfinished. The game still doesn't feel complete without the DLC is what I hear from everyone I know and multiple reviews
wrote on 1 Jun 2025, 16:50 last edited byYou don't need PL to get the latest patches and updates.
"From what I hear from everyone I know"
My brother in Christ, have you even played the game?
-
You don't need PL to get the latest patches and updates.
"From what I hear from everyone I know"
My brother in Christ, have you even played the game?
wrote on 1 Jun 2025, 17:20 last edited byI never said that I said the game doesn't feel complete without it