Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

NodeBB

  1. Home
  2. Selfhosted
  3. PSA: filebrowser is no longer being actively developed

PSA: filebrowser is no longer being actively developed

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Selfhosted
selfhosted
16 Posts 10 Posters 10 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C [email protected]
    This post did not contain any content.
    L This user is from outside of this forum
    L This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote last edited by
    #4

    Ah, this makes sense now. I was wondering why it hadn't been updated in a while, that was my only hangup.

    1 Reply Last reply
    8
    • K [email protected]

      https://github.com/gtsteffaniak/filebrowser

      File browser Quantum is the shiny feature rich fork!

      I have also used filestash with some success

      W This user is from outside of this forum
      W This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote last edited by
      #5

      When the stable release is published, it's honestly a no brainer. Although Filestash is a good alternative too.

      K 1 Reply Last reply
      5
      • K [email protected]

        https://github.com/gtsteffaniak/filebrowser

        File browser Quantum is the shiny feature rich fork!

        I have also used filestash with some success

        darkassassin07@lemmy.caD This user is from outside of this forum
        darkassassin07@lemmy.caD This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote last edited by [email protected]
        #6

        Trying to set that up to try out, but I can't get it to see/use my config.yaml.

        /srv/filebrowser-new/data/config.yaml

        volumes:

        • /srv/filebrowser-new/data:/config
          environment:
        • FILEBROWSER_CONFIG="/config/config.yaml"

        Says '/config/config.yaml' doesn't exist and will not start. Same thing if I mount the config file directly, instead of just its folder.

        If I remove the env var, it changes to "could not open config file 'config.yaml', using default settings" and starts at least. From there I can 'ls -l' through docker exec and see that my config is mounted exactly where it's supposed to be '/config/config.yaml' and has 777 perms, but filebrowser insists it doesn't exist...

        My config is just the example for now.

        I don't understand what I could possibly be doing wrong.

        /edit: three hours of messing around and I figured it out:

        • FILEBROWSER_CONFIG="/config/config.yaml"

        Must not have quotation marks. Removed them and now it's working.

        V 1 Reply Last reply
        7
        • darkassassin07@lemmy.caD [email protected]

          Trying to set that up to try out, but I can't get it to see/use my config.yaml.

          /srv/filebrowser-new/data/config.yaml

          volumes:

          • /srv/filebrowser-new/data:/config
            environment:
          • FILEBROWSER_CONFIG="/config/config.yaml"

          Says '/config/config.yaml' doesn't exist and will not start. Same thing if I mount the config file directly, instead of just its folder.

          If I remove the env var, it changes to "could not open config file 'config.yaml', using default settings" and starts at least. From there I can 'ls -l' through docker exec and see that my config is mounted exactly where it's supposed to be '/config/config.yaml' and has 777 perms, but filebrowser insists it doesn't exist...

          My config is just the example for now.

          I don't understand what I could possibly be doing wrong.

          /edit: three hours of messing around and I figured it out:

          • FILEBROWSER_CONFIG="/config/config.yaml"

          Must not have quotation marks. Removed them and now it's working.

          V This user is from outside of this forum
          V This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote last edited by
          #7

          Must not have quotation marks. Removed them and now it's working.

          Man that's finicky...

          mangopenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM 1 Reply Last reply
          4
          • V [email protected]

            Must not have quotation marks. Removed them and now it's working.

            Man that's finicky...

            mangopenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM This user is from outside of this forum
            mangopenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote last edited by [email protected]
            #8

            It's just a YAML thing, if you do FILEBROWSER_CONFIG:"/config/config.yaml" instead it might work with quotes.

            darkassassin07@lemmy.caD 1 Reply Last reply
            2
            • mangopenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM [email protected]

              It's just a YAML thing, if you do FILEBROWSER_CONFIG:"/config/config.yaml" instead it might work with quotes.

              darkassassin07@lemmy.caD This user is from outside of this forum
              darkassassin07@lemmy.caD This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote last edited by
              #9

              Dev replied to my github discussion.

              Apparently it's an issue with array style env variable layout.

              environment:
                  key:"value"
              

              Instead of

              environment:
                  - key=value
              
              V 1 Reply Last reply
              3
              • K [email protected]

                https://github.com/gtsteffaniak/filebrowser

                File browser Quantum is the shiny feature rich fork!

                I have also used filestash with some success

                B This user is from outside of this forum
                B This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote last edited by
                #10

                Reckon I can get this going somewhere where I don't have sudo?

                K 1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • K [email protected]

                  https://github.com/gtsteffaniak/filebrowser

                  File browser Quantum is the shiny feature rich fork!

                  I have also used filestash with some success

                  C This user is from outside of this forum
                  C This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote last edited by
                  #11

                  I was going to query why fork instead of just maintaining, but after reading theose comments I see the problem.

                  So, ok, I need to start shifting packages...

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  3
                  • B [email protected]

                    Reckon I can get this going somewhere where I don't have sudo?

                    K This user is from outside of this forum
                    K This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote last edited by
                    #12

                    I doubt it, why dont you have sudo?

                    B 1 Reply Last reply
                    2
                    • W [email protected]

                      When the stable release is published, it's honestly a no brainer. Although Filestash is a good alternative too.

                      K This user is from outside of this forum
                      K This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote last edited by
                      #13

                      Ive had some good experience with filestash but recently they swapped to collabora which brought me a host of headaches.

                      The Dev is awesome though.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      2
                      • darkassassin07@lemmy.caD [email protected]

                        Dev replied to my github discussion.

                        Apparently it's an issue with array style env variable layout.

                        environment:
                            key:"value"
                        

                        Instead of

                        environment:
                            - key=value
                        
                        V This user is from outside of this forum
                        V This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote last edited by
                        #14

                        So it's a YAML quirk then?

                        darkassassin07@lemmy.caD 1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • V [email protected]

                          So it's a YAML quirk then?

                          darkassassin07@lemmy.caD This user is from outside of this forum
                          darkassassin07@lemmy.caD This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote last edited by
                          #15

                          I'm not sure whether this is specific to this project, docker, or YAML in general.

                          Looking through my other 20 or so compose files, I use the array notation for most of my environment variables, but I don't have any double quotation marks elsewhere. Maybe they're not supposed to work in this format, idk.

                          Good to keep in mind I guess.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • K [email protected]

                            I doubt it, why dont you have sudo?

                            B This user is from outside of this forum
                            B This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote last edited by
                            #16

                            Not my server, it's a shared one I have a http server and some files on. I want a nice frontend. I've used all in one php ones with some success, but this looks nicer.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Login or register to search.
                            Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Groups