'No gay, no pay': The RuneScape community is absolutely mauling Jagex's new CEO over his decision to cancel new Pride Month events
-
It was joyful and the players made it amazing as well. You weren't alone was the best part in some games.
The War of Emperium concept is easily one of my top 5 greatest game features. Probably #1 or #2. Such a blowout cool idea especially for it's time.
-
Agreed. It's one of the greats.
Trying to say it outlived WoW or in some way beat it is wrong through.
Wow would have to actually be dead first I suppose
-
Pride month celebrations were my go-to events in secret. My family doesn't really understand the niche appeal of the game, and state religious agents can't really "disguise themselves" ingame. But if Jagex is veering right, they might (like twitter) sell my information to security agencies the same way the Sauds/Turks did to Twitter a few years ago.
At least I get to wear my pride cape 24/7 until my membership runs out. In hindsight, It was a bad idea to assume that shooting stars/maple forestry/w301 hate chats were "isolated incidents". They're clearly part of an ongoing trend that has the CEO's approval. Oh well, there's always a countdown to good things. I should enjoy it while it lasts.
Not everything has to be shit at all times. We could make a world where good things are, like, normal.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Yeah people don't want politics in their escapism. Makes sense to me
-
Yeah people don't want politics in their escapism. Makes sense to me
Fantasy is filled to the brim with politics.
-
rs has been declining quite a while, especially since they have significant periods of content droughts. getting gutted by PE firms isnt helping it.
The player base has been steadily increasing for years on the old school side whereas the RS3 has been slowly dying.
https://www.misplaceditems.com/rs_tools/graph/?display=avg&interval=week&total=1
I am curious how much of their revenue is propped up by whales on the RS3 side
-
Pride month celebrations were my go-to events in secret. My family doesn't really understand the niche appeal of the game, and state religious agents can't really "disguise themselves" ingame. But if Jagex is veering right, they might (like twitter) sell my information to security agencies the same way the Sauds/Turks did to Twitter a few years ago.
At least I get to wear my pride cape 24/7 until my membership runs out. In hindsight, It was a bad idea to assume that shooting stars/maple forestry/w301 hate chats were "isolated incidents". They're clearly part of an ongoing trend that has the CEO's approval. Oh well, there's always a countdown to good things. I should enjoy it while it lasts.
consider private servers. idk if they're less reactionary though because I haven't tried them
-
I'm not sure it's really the same kind of thing. I'd argue anyone who is genuinely interested in an MMO would like a different game better. RuneScape has more in common with an AOL chatroom or text based game than a moden MMO even by the standards for an MMO way back when.
Other games wish they were WOW and WOW is a bad game imo.
RuneScape wishes it was Ultima Online.
-
Doing something political for years and then NOT doing something political is not "politically neutral," you're actively decided to make a politically motivated decision instead of simply continue with existing behavior.
I didn't say cancelling it was neutral. I was commenting on the people's opinions that companies should take stances.
Jagex here, clearly already took a stance (they had pride for several years) and then canceled it last minute after already announcing event dates for this year. That's straight up cowardice on their part. Like I've said before - if you're going to do pride as a company, fucking stick to your guns or you'll reveal you were never really an ally.
-
Pride movement is as political as Christmas is political. There will be people that make it a political issue, but that doesn't mean it is actually political. A company that celebrates a holiday that big part of the population celebrate is not siding with a political party or even with a religion. The rights for any minorities in a government or a state is political, but pride is a celebration and as such it is not political. A state making a religion official and forced/encouraged is political. Celebrating Christmas is not political. And celebrating Christmas as a company doesn't mean they alienate customers or employees that don't actually follow the religious side of the holiday.
Don't get sucked into the idea that a company cannot show support for minorities or make events depending on the celebrations socially occurring because you need to be neutral. That's not neutrality, that's self censorship.
To take it to the extremes, are we expecting companies to say they are not against slavery but also not in favor, because it is political? Child labour is bad, but I don't want to support any side because it is too political. Terrorism attacks? Well we don't have a stance against or for them, it's just too political.
There's a big difference between siding with one party or another and not showing a stance into what should be universal human rights. Are universal human rights political? Well kinda, but we shouldn't support, or allow any company that is afraid of supporting human rights because it might alienate some customers... Pride and lgbtq rights might not be on the same level as slavery, terrorism and child labor but hell who someone spends their life with is a human right and has nothing to do with politics.
You must live in a pretty privileged country if you can compare the LGBT rights movement to the anti-slavery movement, a nice "it's done, let's go have some beers now" state of things, eh?
It's certainly not so clear cut in a lot of the world. People are still fighting for their rights and pride is part of it.
If you were in 1850s or 1860s in the US, hell, even some time after that, and your company said "We support black people's rights", that would be very political. Morally the right message to put out, but you suddenly lose half your customers and a bunch of idiots want to kill you. Not a smart business move tbh. Now if you said that for years in a row and then decided "We'll stop our black people's rights campaign", now you're making a whole new political statement, in the exact opposite direction to the original one, and significantly worse. Now you're also alienating the people who DO agree with what you originally said, and hoping that the people you originally alienated, are coming back. They are not.
